Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2012, 03:51:30 AM
Go To Buy-High-Sell-Higher.com Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
News: Most recent blog posts from JDH:
+  Buy High Sell Higher Forum
|-+  General Category
| |-+  General Discussion
| | |-+  "Fun"damentals
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: "Fun"damentals  (Read 892 times)
john77
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 502


View Profile
« on: March 02, 2008, 09:40:30 PM »

Here's a great link from UXC that I found from the CCJ board:

http://www.uxc.com/news/Webb-PDAC-2008-03-02.pdf

Basically a synopsis of the fundamentals of the uranium market in general. I really liked how the writer compared three different bull phases (including this one, if you could call it that) in the uranium markets.

Logged
maxine
Full Member
***
Posts: 141



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2008, 04:16:47 AM »


Here's interesting article I ran across.  Does the fact that such an offer guaranteeing return of principal regardless of outcome and the appeal to high income investors bode well for uranium?  Is everyone finally getting on the bandwagon?   Maybe  an imminent rise in the U sector is expected soon.  I'd like to believe that,  but come to think of it didn't these guys invest bigtime in subprime mortgages?

http://www.citigroup.com/citigroup/press/2008/080229d.htm
Logged
langman57
Full Member
***
Posts: 107


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2008, 09:25:06 AM »

Thanks you guys for two great posts. My feeling is it's a long term hold, and a buy on dips. As far as the Citigroup thing, I'm more than a wee-bit surprised they are offering a guarantee. They are one of the biggest culprits in this subprime mess. Provided they can get through that, I suppose it's a good deal if you have 50k lying around.- oops, make that $76,000 in USD!
« Last Edit: March 03, 2008, 12:03:42 PM by langman57 » Logged
sunseeker
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1343


Stirred not Shaken


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 03, 2008, 03:49:37 PM »

I agree two good posts.

Can we see a light at the end of the tunnel?
Or is it some *%/*~#  with a torch coming to tell us there’s problem?

So far so good Geiger Counter closed up 5.38% on the LSE so I am showing a very small profit on that one again.  I don’t own it but I like to watch Uranium Partn. Corp. (TSE:U) as an indicator. It would be a very good sign if it could break above 13.5CAD.
Since the institutions got interested in uranium things haven’t been exactly predictable.So it’s a good sign that Citigroup are showing an interest. Kiss
Logged

john77
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 502


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 03, 2008, 11:23:28 PM »

Anyone got the new UXC spot price for the week? Their website is still showing Feb 25 price.
Logged
john77
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 502


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 03, 2008, 11:35:00 PM »

Although this is more along the lines of technicals, I thought some of you might be interested in this opinion of sentiment, crashes, and trendlines on the major indices

http://twocents.blogs.com/weblog/2008/03/chart-doodles-s.html

I post if because it seems our uraniums seem to follow general market trends instead of commodities. Prices of other commodities are going to new highs, and our stocks lag ....
Logged
jjj000
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1290



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 04, 2008, 03:53:02 AM »

looks like they are both at $73 now short, $95 long:

http://www.fnarena.com/index2.cfm?type=dsp_newsitem&n=77BA45BC-1871-E587-E177285702BD5184
Logged
john77
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 502


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 04, 2008, 09:10:42 PM »

UXC has a new spot price increased to.... wait for it... $74! A whole dollar up!!! Well, at least it wasn't down.
And more good news, for those who don't check in with Merv's technically uranium daily, the index took a bit of a crash and now the short term is looking bearish again. What can you do. Patience is either a virtue or a killer of accounts.

Logged
jjj000
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1290



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 05, 2008, 12:10:07 AM »

I'm never sure what to make of Merv and his commentary.  I do like his uranium index chart, though, and the weekly performance breakdown.

I'm looking for his uranium index to hit about 3.30 before I consider buying in.  I put in some stink bids for FRG and DNN around the Feb 15 levels there.

Also put in some stink bids today for AUY and TGB around their Feb 21 levels.

Will put in another round for about 5%-10% below those bids if they get filled.  And then another about 5%-10% below those if they get filled.

And then hope they go up from there and not down Smiley
Logged
Depleted
Guest
« Reply #9 on: March 05, 2008, 11:34:19 AM »

Fundamentals are the first step. Then you factor in how the market "preceives" this information.(Mass Psyc) The result or "reality" can be acted upon by TA. TA is the window on mass psychology's perception of the facts of the fundamentals, and I feel is the main weapon in the arsenal when going to battle...
Without it is like trying to fly with your eyes closed.
Logged
john77
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 502


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 05, 2008, 08:07:33 PM »

Here's something for fundamentals again,

USEC Urges Congress to Act Now to Make Recent Trade Agreement with Russia Enforceable

John K. Welch, USEC Inc. president and CEO, told the U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources today that Congress needs to act on legislation that would give the U.S. government the authority it needs to enforce a recent trade agreement on nuclear fuel imports from Russia. USEC (NYSE:USU) believes a recent trade agreement that gives Russia limited access to the U.S. nuclear fuel market starting in 2011, access to 20 percent of the market beginning in 2014 and full access by 2021 reflects an industry consensus on how to proceed with Russian fuel imports. However, the agreement is threatened by a 2005 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in a case involving French nuclear fuel. The court decided that certain enrichment transactions between foreign enrichers and U.S. utilities are outside the scope of the U.S. trade law used to control imports of Russian fuel. If the Russian fuel can be sold and delivered pursuant to transactions that meet the specific terms of the French case, this fuel will enter the U.S. market over and above the quotas negotiated in the trade agreement with Russia. Welch explained that one of the most pressing challenges facing the industry today is how to integrate Russia’s huge nuclear fuel supply into the U.S. market without endangering America’s own nuclear fuel industry. The recent agreement provides a critical transition period to deploy new domestic capacity while giving Russia an opportunity to sell in the United States without threatening the stability of the U.S. market. "Today’s stable market conditions won’t hold if the U.S. government cannot enforce limits on Russian uranium imports,” Welch testified. "Without an enforceable agreement with Russia during the transition, our Paducah plant, our advanced technology project and, I suspect, all the projects underway to ensure America has a secure fuel supply may be in jeopardy. "No one, including USEC, wants to exclude Russia from the U.S. market,” Welch said. "But we need Congress to give the administration the authority to make the agreement work.” Kentucky’s U.S. Senators Mitch McConnell and Jim Bunning, as well as U.S. Rep. Ed Whitfield, recently introduced legislation clarifying that all nuclear fuel imports are subject to U.S. trade law. This legislation would ensure that the agreement with Russia can be enforced according to its terms. "USEC will support any measure that will ensure that the terms negotiated with Russia can be enforced,” said Welch. "Those terms provide an extremely reasonable market opportunity for Russia and for utilities. And they give USEC and others who want to build a U.S. nuclear renaissance based on a secure domestic fuel supply the market stability we need to finance and complete our new enrichment projects.” USEC is deploying new enrichment capacity in Piketon, Ohio. The American Centrifuge Plant will help produce the nuclear fuel that American utilities need and replace the fuel that comes from dismantled Russian nuclear warheads under the Megatons to Megawatts nonproliferation program, which expires in 2013. "We are at a critical juncture in our efforts to support the nuclear renaissance,” Welch said. "Action now to ensure that the recent agreement with Russia is enforceable will facilitate the stable and strong U.S. nuclear fuel industry needed for the renaissance.” Welch testified along with Administration officials and nuclear energy industry leaders. A copy of Welch’s written testimony is available on USEC’s website under News Room: http://www.usec.com/v2001_02/Content/News/NewsTemplate.asp?page=/v2001 _02/Content/News/Speeches/03-05-08.htm (Due to its length, this URL may need to be copied/pasted into your Internet browser's address field. Remove the extra space if one exists.) USEC Inc., a global energy company, is a leading supplier of enriched uranium fuel for commercial nuclear power plants. It expects to deploy the next generation uranium enrichment technology in Piketon, Ohio – the American Centrifuge. The United States Enrichment Corporation, a subsidiary of USEC Inc., operates America’s only uranium enrichment plant in Paducah, Kentucky, and does contract work for the U.S. Department of Energy in Piketon.
Logged
sunseeker
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1343


Stirred not Shaken


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: September 14, 2011, 05:57:47 AM »


The economic situation has forced Greece to close all its hummus and
taramasalata factories.

A double-dip recession.  Cheesy


ATB  Cool
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!