Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 22, 2012, 02:23:56 AM
Go To Buy-High-Sell-Higher.com Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
News: Most recent blog posts from JDH:
+  Buy High Sell Higher Forum
|-+  General Category
| |-+  General Discussion
| | |-+  Stock Market for March 2009
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 25 Print
Author Topic: Stock Market for March 2009  (Read 12801 times)
jjj000
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1290



View Profile
« Reply #30 on: March 05, 2009, 04:29:29 PM »

Relax guys.  Message boards conversations go where they go.  If you don't want to talk politics... then talk about something else!!!  The political comments today are not even close to what they were around the election period, so I don't know what you are complaining about.

But "pathetic and useless"Huh  Go check yourself.  If you find this board useless then I don't know what you're looking for, b/c the continuous stream of analysis and ideas that come out of this crowd is pretty damned valuable...

There is nothing to say about uraniums until something changes.  I posted a ton of links about Chu's new policies toward nuclear power growth, which were largely ignored.

People post their daily thoughts about market direction, and if you don't want to talk about that, ok there too. 

There is a lot of wealth of info and research being shared here on this little obscure message board, and I value the team here and the work they do.

But if a little bit of poo-pooing on your favorite politician of the hour gets you all bent out of shape... well then too bad.  Get over it.
Logged
jjj000
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1290



View Profile
« Reply #31 on: March 05, 2009, 04:37:43 PM »

This board is actually starting to become pathetic/useless, all this whining about politics and policy. I think it's ironic that all the small government/no government advocates sure spend a lot of time monitoring the government.


And you know what, Rich... the people on this board put in literally HOURS of research and analysis and come here to post their thoughts and share them with whoever is interested... for no other reason than sharing and camaraderie.  And I will defend every last one of them, yourself included, for the work and contributions made, even if I disagree.

So calling it "pathetic and useless" just spits on all the work people do here, and frankly, that's a pretty fucked up thing to say and I take personal offense to that.

And Obama is a dickhead.
Logged
jjj000
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1290



View Profile
« Reply #32 on: March 05, 2009, 04:47:41 PM »

My crazy predictions from here:

-- DOW 6300 (S&P 635) maybe by Fri this week


Another 5% down day tomorrow and we are right there.  We'll see.  The bounce would be strong I'd expect, as we are then hitting support levels from '96, and the next support level down is over 30% lower.  Much lower than the difference from the last pocket of support and rally ('97 level).
Logged
sunseeker
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1344


Stirred not Shaken


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: March 05, 2009, 06:19:53 PM »

3j3o
I am in agreement with your previous posts.

We all have strengths, weaknesses, and prejudices. I assume that we all come here to feed off each others strengths, find our own weaknesses, increase our overall understanding of human nature and the markets. In short we are here to gain an edge, and sometimes have a bit of a laugh.
 
On Chu’s new policies I certainly followed your posts (and distributed on to other people).

Obama is a dickhead. He’s inherited a hell of a mess for which there is no quick fix. So I’ll reserve judgement on that one.
J.W.Bush? Well let’s say I wasn’t a fan.

Rich: I am really sorry that you feel the way that you obviously do.
Politics shape people, markets, and countries so they can’t be ignored. Whether you agree or don’t agree with those views is immaterial. Address them if you feel that you must. Otherwise ignore them. You can’t deny that 3j3o and others put a great deal of work into their posts. Surely there is plenty to focus your mind on there?
We have a great melting pot of ideas here. Just as long as we don’t degenerate into hurling insults at each other, and the good ideas keep coming, then I don’t see a problem. I hope that after some thought you will come to the same conclusion.  Wink

ATB
Logged

ArsenalFan
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 51


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: March 06, 2009, 12:16:34 AM »

I love this board.  Its right behind Marketwatch, CNBC and Bloomberg for me.  I check it daily and find it helps me get a feel as to where educated people are positioning themselves.  Now back to business.  I will talk my book for a minute.  Bought quite a bit of Canadian Natural Resources yesterday forgetting that earnings were to come out this morning.  I left the larger than usual position on thinking that earnings were tomorrow.  As you can imagine, I crapped my drawers when I heard about China and then the premarket tanked.  Much to my surprise, they earnings were much, much better than all the analysts had expected.  The stock was only one of a few that were really up on the TSX today ($1.97).  I dialed in and listened to the conference call this morning and it sounds like they are a cash flow generating machine.  I really liked the fact that they are not really concerned about their debt.  It seemed like an afterthought - their cash flow will take care of it in due course.  It was a really positive conference call.  Their Horizon oil sands project started producing synthetic crude about a week ago.  I have been following oil and gas stocks for a long time now (live in Calgary, Alberta) and can tell you that this one seems really underpriced.  If crude goes to $20 then we may have a problem.  The stock tends to tear out of the gates around 35.  Guy Adami (Fast Money), Joe Terranova (Fast Money), Boone Pickens, and a couple of commentators on our Canadian Business News network ALL commented today about a rally in energy stocks.  Many of the respected portfolio managers I track have it as one of their top 2 holdings.  I think its a no brainer in the long run and a good short term pop is likely.  Good luck to all.
Logged
Croaker
Full Member
***
Posts: 209



View Profile
« Reply #35 on: March 06, 2009, 12:37:02 AM »

 Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Sorry all.  That is all I can do about how one man can piss so many people off when he is doing what he believes he should do. Just like the last guy and the guy before him and the guy before him.

Become President and see how everyone will talk about you when you are the man and "SUPPOSELY" making all the decisions.

 Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

As for the stock market.  I am long on Gold due to the financial mess. 

I am watching the financials, but will not think about buying any until the end of the year, maybe.

The same goes for all the BLUE CHIP stocks. I just don't see them doing anything until the economy stabilizes and people get the warm and fuzzy and the market starts creating more jobs again.

I am also long on energy, got my Fund and letting it sit and collecting the nice yield until the prices go back up.

Patience is a virtue, I figured that out after last years @ss beating.....

Surfing with both eyes wide open.....and Jaws is still back there.  Waiting, patiently....to strike......again.
Logged
MetalMeister
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1699


The Chairman Of The Board


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: March 06, 2009, 12:50:48 AM »

ArsenalFan,

I looked and looked for this chart for you, thought I had posted it here before but could not find it.  Found it on another forum I have...

Oil will not go to $20, this chart shows why.  If it did, then a large part of the world's oil business would be out of business.  See my post earlier today and from Feb 12.  $33 when I predicted the buy on Feb 12 and 33.5% higher now.

Those Canadian Oil Sands look about $85 to produce.  There will be too much pressure as OPEC cuts output for the price not to jump upwards.  The world can not do enough demand destruction to really keep prices down or the world would cease to exist as we know it.  Prices did not fall, anyway, as a result of lower demand or stockpiles either.  It was all manipulation.  That's what I believe anyway.  IMO, for what it's worth...

Oil has a lot more upside in the near future, I believe, yeah some dips but still has to go up, up, and away.

If I was really pressed for a guess, I would say oil is heading to a little over $60 in relatively short order and then consolidate before it moves a lot higher.

I love this board.  Its right behind Marketwatch, CNBC and Bloomberg for me. 

Their Horizon oil sands project started producing synthetic crude about a week ago.  I have been following oil and gas stocks for a long time now (live in Calgary, Alberta) and can tell you that this one seems really underpriced.  If crude goes to $20 then we may have a problem.  The stock tends to tear out of the gates around 35.  Guy Adami (Fast Money), Joe Terranova (Fast Money), Boone Pickens, and a couple of commentators on our Canadian Business News network ALL commented today about a rally in energy stocks.  Many of the respected portfolio managers I track have it as one of their top 2 holdings.  I think its a no brainer in the long run and a good short term pop is likely.  Good luck to all.

« Last Edit: March 06, 2009, 12:56:04 AM by yellowcaked » Logged

Basically, I'm for anything that gets you through the night - be it prayer, tranquilizers or a bottle of Jack Daniels - Frank Sinatra
ArsenalFan
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 51


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: March 06, 2009, 01:09:24 AM »

Can you say low cost producer......
Canadian Natural Resources has started production from the Horizon oil
sands project in Canada, the company said Thursday.

     First production of synthetic crude oil form the project took place on
February 28, CNR said in a statement.

     The company is currently filling storage tanks to prepare for blending
and pipeline shipments, it said.

     The naphtha and gasoil hydrotreaters in Horizon's first phase are fully
operational and capable of producing around 55,000 b/d. A distillate
hydrotreater is due to be ready by the end of April, which will boost total
capacity to its full target level of 110,000 b/d.

     CNR said volumes would fluctuate on a weekly basis for the time being,
with a steady ramp-up starting at the end of the second quarter and full
production reached by the end of this year.

     The company said operating costs this year were expected to be around
C$35-40/barrel (US$27.34-31.25/b) of synthetic crude, falling to C$25-35/b
over the life of the project.

     "The Horizon project was designed, engineered and built in an extremely
volatile and inflationary business environment with final construction costs
totaling approximately $9.7 billion. This equates to $88,182 per flowing
barrel of capacity," the company said in a statement.

     "Although this is above the initial cost estimate of $6.8 billion the
company targeted in 2005 based on capital efficiency, the cost still comes in
well below the industry average for current and future projects with similar
facilities," it said.
Logged
MetalMeister
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1699


The Chairman Of The Board


View Profile
« Reply #38 on: March 06, 2009, 01:52:22 AM »

Arsenal,

That's very low cost.

Can you provide a link for that?  I want to send it to someone.

Thanks!
Logged

Basically, I'm for anything that gets you through the night - be it prayer, tranquilizers or a bottle of Jack Daniels - Frank Sinatra
ArsenalFan
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 51


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: March 06, 2009, 02:03:41 AM »

Here you go.  Tell him to wait a month so I can sell him my shares at $50.00 lol....lol...

http://www.platts.com/Oil/News/8397929.xml?src=rssheadlines0
Logged
ArsenalFan
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 51


View Profile
« Reply #40 on: March 06, 2009, 02:13:31 AM »

Just had a second look at the call given your post Yellowcaked.

 Here is the transcript:

http://seekingalpha.com/article/124430-canadian-natural-resources-limited-q4-2008-earnings-call-transcript?page=3

It looks like the Oil Sands project costs may not be calculated in the above figures.  Nevertheless, still a low cost producer.
Logged
sunseeker
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1344


Stirred not Shaken


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: March 06, 2009, 05:38:01 AM »

The case for Gold (not GLD) and US government policy by Eric Sprott.

http://www.sprott.com/pdf/marketsataglance/MAAG.pdf


ATB
Logged

jjj000
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1290



View Profile
« Reply #42 on: March 06, 2009, 05:50:11 AM »

...Prices did not fall, anyway, as a result of lower demand or stockpiles either.  It was all manipulation.  That's what I believe anyway.  IMO, for what it's worth...


I agree, yc... in fact I think it was a co-ordinated blitz to hit the Russians in the gut... but one that got out of control faster than expected... that's my guess.

In fact, I also think this whole GM "we could go bankrupt" nonsense is just that as well... more PR scare tactics manipulation... in this case in order to get a nice fat government check.  It's like everyone these days wants to use public fearmongering to pressure the government's hand into giving away tax dollars willy nilly... regardless of the cost/effect on the market.

Anyway... nice links, will look into the above mentioned.  Right now I'm not in love with the CNQ chart from a TA perspective.  Just broke down/out of a pennant, so I think there is some time to see how it behaves while still under $40 and have room to jump in before it takes off toward the 50's... my two cents... adding it to my watch list though...

- j
« Last Edit: March 06, 2009, 05:58:09 AM by jjj000 » Logged
jjj000
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1290



View Profile
« Reply #43 on: March 06, 2009, 06:03:18 AM »

Become President and see how everyone will talk about you when you are the man and "SUPPOSELY" making all the decisions.


Well that's an easy one... I already know I'm a dickhead  Roll Eyes
Logged
Bottomfeeder
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1104



View Profile
« Reply #44 on: March 06, 2009, 10:20:44 AM »

I had to think about this post a little....the board has some fire in its eyes, which is good, and I think to be expected given the performance of the markets, especially the past couple of weeks.

I think in reading the previous posts the most disappointing thing, is that frankly market based comments are being viewed as politics at all!   I try to share my perceptions to help myself and others monetize these perceptions.  I put more time into this than most guys have and hope that some find it helpful.   My interest is in the market perceptions not the political pundits.

If I offended anyone by the "high right hand joke" or the Palin joke, I apologize, but lighten up.

 I am personally one that believes that the markets are a great identifier of truth, sometimes taking time to play out.   

However, if anyone is taking offense to my perceptions of market reaction to geo-political events than so be it, but please have the courage to post truthfully and thoughtfully, with all YOUR bias's aside. 

I mean maybe it is just a coincidence that the markets have been in a freefall since Obama presented his budget?  Maybe I missed some new surprising catastropic economic event, that has failed to appear in any business related broadcast, market website or business publication since? 

As far as my comments about Obama, I am only judging his body of work as I see it, along with the rest of our government.  His constant public appearances, and economic/market related comments, are in my mind completely fair game.   

IF you disagree about a specific interpretation, then again, I and I am sure many others would love to see how YOU process the same  information and the markets response.  Maybe you have a good reason to believe that GDP will grow beyond 5% next year, while our lending arms continue to be broken? 

The markets dont have Republican or Democratic dollars, which is why both (investors) are losing their asses just like everyone else that is or wants to be optimistic!

This and the previous Administration/Legislature elected to intervene in these markets and as such are now THE MARKET.  I mean the entire market, just about every sector I can think of.

It appears that private capital doesn't see many opportunities to invest in this new marketplace.  I mean it just appears that way to me.   I feel no sense of responsibility for their choices, nor remorseful for what I believe to be objecitve opinions on it.

DSL specifically I agree with you on valuations.  As you know, LEVERAGE is the key component to achieving growth.  Which obviously has been my ax to grind, along with the PR gaffs that have continued to surround it.  Sorry it is what it is.  The S&P cant have growth without leverage. Right? Cant have leverage without banks right? And you cant attract private capital while the public is financing the banks right?  I mean how do you think S&P growth occurs?  That is the reason why growth projections are heading down and the market is re-pricing. Right?

Better get those bank assets in order FIRST PRIORITY or anything else is just a political populist pipedream, as thrift and deflation will CONTINUE to destroy the financial capacity of our country, lending institutions, and ALL ITS CITIZENS.  Remember guys bank stock is  PART of a banks capital structure!

As far as what Repulicans and Democrats want, therin lies the problem.  They want to CONTINUE to take care of themselves.  I mean does anyone here really think that Blago is a political exception?  How nieve (sp).  (BTW I dont even know or care what party he belongs to.)  I could personally care less about anyones pet politicians, and who you like, or for whatever reason you have been conditioned to believe so.  I am politically agnostic, and I believe for good reason.

I mean come on did anybody see the bill with 8000 earmarks that Obama isn't going to stop,(against his promise) and neither will McCain (against his promise).  They all suck, and the political fleecing of our nations peoples continues.  An obvious trend in tact.

I continue to think that the political ideologues are just a bunch of Kool-Aid drinkers, whatever side their on.  I mean which is worse McCain not knowing anything about the economy (his words) or Obama thinking that he does?  Who cares, neither of them do, and our system for appropriations is broken and biased by politics.  I mean how can anything get "fixed" with that as a backdrop?

I mean the Chinese are much better at capital deployment for example, even though they are basically communists.  I mean isn't that just the truth?  I would rather they design our economic stimulus plan!  This lousy second rate government prepared and agreed on a 800B stimulus plan in what 4 weeks?  Anybody here think that is intelligent?  I spend more time planning for vacations. 

Remember an important historical discovery... the world is round not flat, get it?

I mean who is seeking rough landings and smooth landings?  The only ones who even think that way are those seeking elective office or supporting those seeking or in office. 

Certainly Main Street and Wall Street don't think that way! Cheesy   

To me this is not about Obama's ideology, but rather about him continuing to shove huge spending bills through the government, while his political clout is high.  Rubber stamped, plain and simple.  If you recall, that is why I stated during the election that I am a "gridlock" guy, checks and balances.

He is way too smart a guy to think that this is the "smoothest" way to go about conducting business in an economic crisis.  I mean you think it makes sense to remove charitable deductions from anybody when so many people are hurting, to dis-insentify "private" giving?  Is that caring?

Do you think that it makes sense to give home buying credits to buyers and then remove the mortgage deduction in the middle of a housing related financial crisis?  Start National Health care legislation first allocating what 600B, then working on a plan second? ? Cap and trade policies, now?  All right now in the first 40 days when he hasn't even got his staff hired yet? Roll Eyes  In the middle of all this mess?  Really?Shocked  Smooth?

I haven't seen any Obama "fan" come out and say "man that doesn't seem smart".  How come?  Because this all looks smart to you guys?  Please, not even in your dreams.  Why can't you guys do that?  Let me answer that for you this way.  ITS NOT BECAUSE OF MY POLITICAL BIAS. Shocked 

If you guys are put off by the markets perceptions, then you should check yourselves and not blame the messengers.   If you think that these things aren't impacting the market, then I think you live in a vacuum. 

 I mean you guys should be out there touting his policies and timing and showing some of us non-believers specifically how this is benefical to creating greater middle class wealth and all the opportunities to monetize them in the marketplace. 

Instead you are the same freakin guys out there feeling "better than ever" about gold/silver and the hyperinflation story with your money and talking about the way to create middle class wealth on the other!  Talk about conflicted ?  Your investment dollars are indicating a trend in tact (continuation) it would appear to me?

Maybe for some of the people "investing" that visit this site, these things dont matter much, because you are "buy and hold" investors, but for guys like me and a few others that are investing AND "trading" these markets, this stuff is essential for timing.  I mean it is the market, now.  This IS the stuff that these markets are moving on.  These policies are what dictate capital deployment and growth!!

Making excuses for losing money, due to manipulation, or this guys fault or not this guys fault might make you guys feel better about losing money, but to me I could care less, its still money lost, and most everyone I know would like to see the markets go up, regardless of their affiliation.

YC....good call there in February
3j...I was all over the Chu stuff but appreiated the post.  Remember I am still a U believer! Cheesy
Croaker...I have been churning the financials long (and losing!), but I think a big upside move is coming here pretty soon.  My strategy is to "follow the money" and bet that the bankers are smarter than the politicians.

Sorry for the long post, I gotta get ready for the markets response to the jobs report.

GLTA
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 25 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!